The Art Of Listening

with Keine Kommentare

In April, the pilot ses­si­on of a new work­shop for­mat took place at the Pablo Neru­da Libra­ry. The work­shop was faci­li­ta­ted by Omer Eilam on behalf of Lev Ber­lin. It was desi­gned for music afi­ci­o­na­dos, both ama­teur and pro­fes­sio­nal, and aimed to open a door to expe­ri­men­tal music for a non-aca­de­mic audience.

by Omer Eilam

The Art of Lis­tening seeks to deve­lop a form of expe­ri­en­ti­al lis­tening, in which we direct our full atten­ti­on to the act of lis­tening its­elf. This inau­gu­ral ses­si­on was dedi­ca­ted to the pie­ce Gesang der Jüng­lin­ge by Karl­heinz Stock­hausen and also ser­ved as an intro­duc­tion to the approach.

As avant-gar­de elec­tro­nic music still feels for­eign and chal­len­ging to many, we began in more fami­li­ar ter­ri­to­ry. We lis­ten­ed to a short pia­no pie­ce by Jean-Phil­ip­pe Rameau and recor­ded our impres­si­ons through words and colors. It was illu­mi­na­ting to see how some respon­ses were shared (“I hear the sound of a pia­no”, “I hear a melo­dy”, etc.), while others -espe­ci­al­ly the pain­tings- were high­ly indi­vi­dua­li­zed. In this way, we beca­me awa­re of the dual natu­re of musi­cal expe­ri­ence, which con­ta­ins both objec­ti­ve and sub­jec­ti­ve dimensions.

We then ven­tu­red into more unfa­mi­li­ar ter­ri­to­ry: we lis­ten­ed to the first two struc­tures of Gesang der Jüng­lin­ge and repea­ted the same expe­ri­ment. We asked our­sel­ves: How is this music dif­fe­rent? and How are we dif­fe­rent when lis­tening to it?

It was espe­ci­al­ly enligh­tening to obser­ve the con­trasts bet­ween the pain­tings inspi­red by the two pie­ces (see the images below). Through open dis­cus­sion, par­ti­ci­pan­ts were able to catch a glim­pse of others’ expe­ri­en­ces and gra­du­al­ly deve­lop con­cepts that hel­ped them access the music. We lis­ten­ed to the musi­cal excerpt a second time, and alre­a­dy many were able to form various points of ent­ry based on this shared experience.

In the second part of the work­shop, I pro­vi­ded an over­view of the his­to­ri­cal, metho­do­lo­gi­cal, and poe­tic aspects of the pie­ce. We dis­cus­sed the ear­ly days of elec­tro­nic music and how unfa­mi­li­ar it must have sound­ed to tho­se who atten­ded its pre­mie­re in 1956. I explai­ned Stockhausen’s inten­ti­on to uni­fy vocal and elec­tro­nic sounds in every ima­gi­nable form:

“They [the sounds] should be as fast, as long, as loud, as soft, as den­se and inter­wo­ven, with as small and lar­ge pitch inter­vals, and in as dif­fe­ren­tia­ted varia­ti­ons of tim­bre as the ima­gi­na­ti­on might requi­re, freed from the phy­si­cal limi­ta­ti­ons of any one singer.”

Karl­heinz Stockhausen

We also loo­ked at the bibli­cal text that inspi­red the pie­ce. It tells of three young men who were con­dem­ned to be bur­ned ali­ve by King Nebuch­ad­nez­zar for refu­sing to bow befo­re his image—but were mira­cu­lous­ly unhar­med when they began sin­ging prai­ses to God. 

Tog­e­ther, we exami­ned frag­ments of the score and tried to under­stand the pains­ta­king pro­cess through which Stock­hausen recor­ded thou­sands of sounds and laye­red them next to and over one ano­ther to crea­te swarms of sine waves and noi­se. Final­ly, we lis­ten­ed to the pie­ce in its enti­re­ty, using the con­cepts we had deve­lo­ped as bea­cons of light to help us navi­ga­te its dark waters.

Throug­hout this pro­cess, we gra­du­al­ly dis­co­ver­ed not only the lan­guage of elec­tro­nic music but also a new way of listening.

“It should not be for­got­ten that the two-year rea­li­sa­ti­on work from 1954 to 1956 was a uni­que time of jubilant­ly prai­sing God, and that I mys­elf was a ‘youth in the fiery furnace’.”

Karl­heinz Stockhausen